The controversial topic of merit based or performance based is among the most heated topics in education today. The debate is whether or not teachers salaries should be reflected by by student performance or should it be as it always has where teachers are paid by education and experience.
Merit Pay Pros-
- Teachers get are rewarded for their production
- Less degrees are needed to make higher wages
- Students grades may not reflect efort and expertise of the teacher
- Student populations vary; AP teachers will undoubtedly have higher scores than remedial students
On the flip side you have teachers who have no business being in a classroom making $50,000-$80,000 a year on the taxpayers bill. If their students consistently under perform how can we justify continuing to give them raises and steady jobs.
A Happy Medium
- There are other options that have been suggested. Offering teacher incentives for performance should motivate teachers to try harder, yet they still have a secure base salary that they can rely on.
- Option contracts teachers have the option to select their contract that they will use for a 5yr period and with extra incentives in the performance based contract.
- Another alternative is grading students progress from previous years. Percentage growth rather than raw scores. So in this scenario the teacher is not trying to out do other classes but rather attempting to improve their own results.
Where do you stand on this issue? Is there a clear direction that the schools should go in? Is their other alternatives to consider?